Sunday, July 29, 2007

Review: Transformers

I will now irritate countless art-film fans by following up my single paragraph on Pan's Labyrinth with a full review of Transformers. Weeks later, even.

No, Transformers is not better than Pan's Labyrinth.

America did not invent the automobile or, depending on who you ask, the motion picture, but it introduced both to the mass market. While the age of American passenger cars that mean anything is long gone, the crowd-pleasing blockbuster is still defined overwhelmingly by work that takes place between the Golden State Freeway and the public-access-required beaches of Southern California's coast.

A case in point is Transformers, a film that astounds as much with its overly self-confident duration (144 minutes) and its obvious staggering cost as with its consistent humor and impeccable action craft. If you have to ask how much Transformers cost, your country's film industry can't afford it, and if you object that it's largely a product placement within a product placement, you don't get it. Transformers is a romp: a funny, preposterous, violent, and proudly idiotic film.

The atomically pure formula story throws suburban teenager Sam Witwicky (the Kevjumba-like Shia LaBeouf) into the middle of a battle between two factions of giant robots from an alien planet. One side likes humans and the other doesn't.

What triggers all this is Sam's purchase of his first car, the canonical bitchin' Camaro, a yellow 1970s example that along with the funk of a thousand bong hits harbors a strange emblem in the middle of the steering wheel. That's our clue that it's something a little, a little more, in the immortal words of David Lee Roth.

The first part of Transformers is suffused with teen-angst imagery that owes a lot to the era of that Camaro, which promptly gets geeky Sam very close to the hottest chick in school. On a hillside overlooking LA at sunset, even.

Then the CGI begins, and what amazing CGI it is. The transformers are all cars to start with, some of them rusty and dented cars, and those worn car parts stay on the robots after their transformations. They're fast and remarkably seamless transformations, too. Plus, these CGI creatures appear in full color in broad daylight, unlike the slate-gray renderings we're used to seeing in CGI. The robot characters belong on Saturday-morning TV -- which is where they originated, after all -- but the filmmakers know it. Transformers doesn't take itself seriously. And it's refreshing to see a sci-fi actioner that has nothing to do with human social problems. This is just between the aliens.

Combine a cartoon plot and male fascination with military might, however, and some lines are bound to be crossed. The film starts with the U.S. military fighting off the evil robots when they first land, which happens to be in the Middle East. Transformers not only glorifies violence and largely disregards its impact on the native population, it also has little time for the victims of battle among the military's own ranks. Taking it that one step beyond the typical dumb bravado of American war movies, in a time of war no less, is unconscionable.

That's an unfortunate blemish on a movie that for the most part is a pleasure to watch, thanks in part to its cast, including the likable LaBeouf, Rachael Taylor and Anthony Anderson as dueling computer geeks, and the stern Michael O'Neill, who gets to flesh out his recurring role as an all-business Secret Service officer on "The West Wing."

It's pure American blockbuster fare that with cliches and shorthands avoids the talk and emoting that bogged down Spider-Man 3 and Superman Returns. But there are interesting touches, too: For part of the film, the robots are battling over an antique pair of glasses, creating a clever juxtaposition of fragility and heft. And there are numerous nods to Asian action traditions, including Godzilla-like city-smashing and a Chow-Yun Fat gunplay move. Early in the movie, Sam says the robots must have come from Japan, a comment simultaneously on the monster-movie tradition, the robots' samurai-like appearance and America's insecurity about its industrial prowess as Toyota overtakes GM as the world's biggest automaker. Yet in an age of national anxiety, at its best Transformers reminds us what America still does best.

Labels:

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Quick takes

Since returning from our cross-country trip, I've been busy with a church video project and a number of other things. But I haven't been neglecting movies, just putting off writing about them. Before I forget all about the recent ones, here are some quick impressions:

Pan's Labyrinth: Much more than a typical fairy tale. The fantasy characters are deliciously flawed and complicated, and the movie doesn't just hint at the grim realities our dreamer needs to escape, it shows them in gruesome detail. The parallels between dream and real life are brilliant.

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid: Maybe some earlier film I don't know about had a big influence on George Roy Hill, but this 1969 megahit looks like the very blueprint of early Seventies style. Backlighting and halo effects, anyone? Ankle-length Victorian dresses? Robert Redford's wavy locks? I could almost taste the gorp. But the movie's aged about as well as peanuts, raisins, corn nuts, and M&M's in a Kelty backpack on a hot day. The idea of Western outlaws as charming free-love nonconformists on a lark is the epitome of Baby Boomer narcissism. Butch and Sundance's sudden moment of remorse over killing a bunch of innocent Bolivians is such an obvious Vietnam reference that it just makes this macrame trifle unravel that much faster. Gimme shelter.

Ocean's 12: Now here's a movie that knows it's meringue. It's the glitzy European heist flick as all glitz and no heist. The popcorn pandering reaches delirious heights at the movie's self-referential climax. But director Steven Soderbergh's visuals are anything but dumb, with endlessly inventive angles including a twist on the jumbo-jet-landing shot that's so bizarre I can't even reconstruct it in my mind.

Labels:

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

Play it again: Colma

There's nothing like a movie premiere, and never more so than in the case of Colma: The Musical. That night was like the first concert by a great band we had all just discovered. Plus, they were funny!

Yet the second time I saw the movie, last Sunday on its second weekend of commercial release, some things were even better. The songs, for one. I've grown to know them on CD, and I strongly disagree with one critic who said they haven't aged as well as the film. In fact, the one scene that maybe didn't have to be as long as it is, set to the somber ballad "Deadwalking," kept me glued to my seat waiting for the harmonies in the last verse. The acting looked better than the first time, too. The movie's also been edited down for commercial release, and it feels sharper. I also came into the theater knowing a lot more about the production, having interviewed director Richard Wong and writer/composer H.P. Mendoza. The single shot that covers most of a scene at a house party is astonishing, especially if you keep your eye on a development that takes place near the end of it. On the whole, the movie seemed a little darker, though still funny. It's a great story about leaving your hometown, the place that seems like the deadest place in the world when you're 18, and for these characters, really is.